How to Write a Research Paper Essay

This should be sent to a daybook Very good work, but Im not sure why Alan Bundy hasnt create verbally this? Anonymous review Clearly the author fails to understands Walshs previous work on this topic inaugural Lesson seizet lose heart Even if you do invariablyything right, reviewing is imperfect Good papers entrust be rejected But try to learn from your knock-backs Why you? Academic carg oner Publish or perish Have an impact Communicate your precedes Many reserve not had the impact they deserve for existence bad writers composition is fun Outline How to get your paper rejected.There are umteen traps regular experienced researchers make Myself very much included Hints about how to write a paper create verbally is a craft not a science How to be rejected Submit over-length Blind man send in 7 pages even though the instructions clearly say 5 in one case they see quality of work, theyll be pleased you sent in more material How to be rejected Submit over- length Diplomatic immunity put extra 2 pages in appendix Appendices clearly beart count Similarly, bibliography doesnt count How to be rejected Submit over-length LaTeX hacker miscellanea from 11 to 9 point font squeeze inter-line billet No one will ever notice How to be rejected Submit late Deadlines are meant for everyone else Review schedules concur plenty of slop Your paper is worth the wait How to be rejected You acquiret have room for space wasters like Motivation, Background, link work Why do review forms constantly have these on them at any rate? How to be rejected Annoy lector/reviewer Proof is trivial, when it isnt Prove the trivial decompose to cite their work Only cite yourself How to be rejected Annoy reader/reviewer Dont bother to spell check What do computers know about spelling anyway? hold all the old cliches There has been a lot of interest recently in world(a) constraints. How to be rejected Annoy reader/reviewer Be pompous, boring, This is science not literature guys, who said it should be fun? Be overly formal Theorems and formulas add weight How to be rejected Annoy reader/reviewer Make them really work After all, these are dif? cult concepts and it took you some time send away reviews Just keep sending paper in, eventually it will be accepted How to write a paper Hints about how to write Preparation musical composition itself Ethics Preparation. point, read, read To learn how to write, read a lot I spend over 20% of my time reading 1 day/ workweek in library Read, Read, Read Related literature So you fuel cite it So you dont re-invent twines So you know what others think are meaning(a) research questions Read, Read, Read Other group/journal papers where you intend to publish So you learn the house style So you rotter place your work within the bigger picture So you learn how to learn good questions Read, Read, Read Any sort of literature Magazines, tonics, biograp hies, Writing is a skill, learn from others I read approx one novel/week as a way of trying to learn how to write And I have the highlife of writing in my own language Review, Review, Review Review as much as you can So you see good/bad writing So you see the soreest results (but see ethics) So you ask yourself good questions What is the contribution here? What are the weaknesses? Write, Write, Write The best preparation to writing is to write Writing gets easier the more you do it Writing is easier if youve drafted much of what you already need Writing is the best way to grind away your thoughts Writing is a good way to record what you have done. Writing achievement out the timetable move papers frequently rejected Late papers are almost always rejected If you always write to deadlines, writing will seem more painful than it is Writing Work out the content You should be able to convey this in one sentence We propose a new global constraint, provide a ? lter ing algorithm and show it useful on some standard benchmarks Writing Work out the message You should be able to convey this in one sentence We identify an important class of symmetry, and show how to break it Write to the message Writing Distribute the work Play to your strengths If you have a native speaker, have them write intro/conclusion Write to length Brutally shorten papers are frequently rejected Writing Structure paper before you write it I write template for paper with sections and subsection headings ? rst Intro, Background, Theoretical results, Empirical results, Related work, Conclusions Writing Start where you are most happy Often write from the middle outwards Theoretical results, Experiments, , Conclusions, Introduction, Abstract Writing get of Three Say everything 3 times Introduce idea (introduction) Develop idea (body of paper) Summarize result (conclusions) But dont copy verbatim the same text Title Make it significant and brief Dont ma ke a joke Remember someone reading denotation needs to be able to work out likely contents Good the TSP phase innovation Bad Easy Problems are sometimes Hard Abstract Executive summary Try for one sentence or so on Motivation Method Key result Conclusions Introduction What is the chore? Why is it interesting? What are your contributions? What is the outline of what you will show? Introduction. Lure the reader in a with a good ? rst sentence Bad There has been a lot of work recently on phase transition behaviour Good Global constraints are exchange to the success of constraint programming Background Often need to set scene De? ne formalism Get reader up to speed Identify research problem Body of Paper Derive theoretical results Propose new algorithm Describe system engineered Results Bullet proof paper Theoretical results Experiments only provide a limited view Experimental results Theory doesnt show if results are useful in practice.Related work Has many purposes You give proper credit to prior work You are not re-inventing wheel You can compare what you do with what has been done before Conclusions Remind reader of what you have done signal work in wider context What general lessons might be learnt from this study? Flag all the evoke open research directions Acknowledgements Thank all who have helped you Provided code, data sets, Thank ? nancial sponsors Writing Keep it sincere Active, not passive Present, not past or future Long words Short sentences Writing Avoid temptation to include every result you have Paper needs to be ordered Paper needs to be understandable Many papers are rejected for having too many results Ethics of Writing Authorship Citation Submission Publication Authorship Who should be an author? Anyone who has make a signi? cant contribution May not have written any text eer err on the side of caution Authorship Who should be an author? Ask Youll be move how often people refuse You can be sure theyll not work with you again if they looking at they should be Authorship Should my advisor be an author?In ? rst few years of thesis, probably yes .. one time you graduate, you should (be able to) write papers on your own Again, ask Citation Cite all pertinent work Reviews always ask about Related Work Youll want them to cite you Its central to the scienti? c method We stand on the shoulders of others Citation Do I cite myself for a fraud review? Yes You must credit all previous work Either cite Author, 2004 Or write As Walsh has shown previously Walsh 2004 Submission Can I submit to multiple concourses? Whats the deal with the disclaimer (This paper is not under review ..)? Can I submit to a journal directly? No hard and fast rules My rule, once reviews are back and paper is effectively in bring up Publication Can I publish my conference paper as it is in a journal? Probably not, even though conference is not archival Most jour nals ask you to extend conference paper substantially Proofs, more experiments, Final words It takes time to learn how to write Dont be put off if at ? rst your have papers rejected All of us have papers rejected Spend time learning how to write It will be worth the investment.